<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s in Charge Here?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jepaikin.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/whos-in-charge-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jepaikin.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/whos-in-charge-here/</link>
	<description>.judaism.theatre.music.philosophy.politics.canada.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:37:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://jepaikin.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/whos-in-charge-here/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jepaikin.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I hate to come across as smug, so, if I do, know that that&#039;s not my intention.

In my first year of rabbinical school (round 1) I was asked the following question in regards to an argument that I had made, basically along all the lines of your thoughts above. So now I turn it to you.

How is what you describe any different than much of the Conservative Movement&#039;s theology? Isn&#039;t the theological underpinning of Reform the fact that autonomy &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; negate the need for textual authority within the tradition.

On the other hand, you sound a lot like R. Washofsky, which ain&#039;t too bad a thing. On the other hand, that can be a very lonely soap box on which to stand. Trust me.

On the other hand, I&#039;ve already written too much. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to come across as smug, so, if I do, know that that&#8217;s not my intention.</p>
<p>In my first year of rabbinical school (round 1) I was asked the following question in regards to an argument that I had made, basically along all the lines of your thoughts above. So now I turn it to you.</p>
<p>How is what you describe any different than much of the Conservative Movement&#8217;s theology? Isn&#8217;t the theological underpinning of Reform the fact that autonomy <i>does</i> negate the need for textual authority within the tradition.</p>
<p>On the other hand, you sound a lot like R. Washofsky, which ain&#8217;t too bad a thing. On the other hand, that can be a very lonely soap box on which to stand. Trust me.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve already written too much. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
